0% chance my 16 person league returns after Pocono scoring debacle. Anyone else joining me?
- Thread starter dkalmar57
- Start date
IT'S OK TO CHEAT
New member
I'm feeling from now on
if a driver is in first before the last two laps and somebody takes him out
then that does not count and he should get the the points for first place
this change the rules now and maybe we can get as far away from Nascar rules as we can
and by the way I had Hamlin as my driver and I don't want to be rewarded for someone that cheated
so I'm not counting the points for Hamlin on my team for that race
because I NO right from wrong
After this year my league is out too
PS. I DON'T GAVE A RATS ASS HOW DRAFT KING RUNS THERE WEB SITE
if a driver is in first before the last two laps and somebody takes him out
then that does not count and he should get the the points for first place
this change the rules now and maybe we can get as far away from Nascar rules as we can
and by the way I had Hamlin as my driver and I don't want to be rewarded for someone that cheated
so I'm not counting the points for Hamlin on my team for that race
because I NO right from wrong
After this year my league is out too
PS. I DON'T GAVE A RATS ASS HOW DRAFT KING RUNS THERE WEB SITE
Is that seriously an argument that DGG is making? "Draftkings does the same stupid thing so it's cool for us to do it too."
DGG is a total clown show.
Dawg
New member
I can't believe all this whining. BetMGM house rules are so similar to DGG's that you'd think they were authored by the same person. You won't be missed.
"All wagers will be settled according to the unofficial results reported immediately after the conclusion of the race by the governing organization. Any changes to the finishing order that occurs based on appeals, penalties or scoring malfunctions after the race has concluded, will not be recognized."
I could go Copy and paste hard rocks policy where they wait until AFTER post race inspection to score wagers. But I'm not going to bring in some 3rd party's rule as justification for DGG making stuff up as they go along. Using a 3rd party's terms of service is a really bad argument. Bro.
Dawg
New member
So you didn't read the rules at the beginning of the season? You believe this decision was made after Pocono? Of course you don't, no clue why you would imply as such.....
You're on the wrong side of right this time.
Again, the DQ scoring rule is absolutely absurd. Just because it was there before the season doesn't make it better. How far down your throat is their boot? You aren't even arguing in favor of the rule. You are just trying to poke little holes in what I'm saying. Lol
Hey Dawg,
So are you done whining about the people whining about the DQ scoring rule?
Or do you want to offer a legitimate argument relating to the specific validity of why Ty Gibbs scored points for Ku Busch and why DGG doesn't listen to the OFFICIAL results of the race besides "the rule was already there and MGM does it too"
Because those seem convenient arguments that dodge the real question which is "Why is fantasy NASCAR not scored based off of the official results?"
I'm gonna assume you don't and would rather just act like the moderator of what opinions people should have.
So are you done whining about the people whining about the DQ scoring rule?
Or do you want to offer a legitimate argument relating to the specific validity of why Ty Gibbs scored points for Ku Busch and why DGG doesn't listen to the OFFICIAL results of the race besides "the rule was already there and MGM does it too"
Because those seem convenient arguments that dodge the real question which is "Why is fantasy NASCAR not scored based off of the official results?"
I'm gonna assume you don't and would rather just act like the moderator of what opinions people should have.
And here is the policy from a other casino stating that wager would be scored based on the official results provided by the governing body of the sport. AKA NASCAR.
You really think stating MGM's policy is a strong argument for why DGG should do the same? How about providing am actual argument relating to the validity of said policy. But you won't. You just say "look over there. They do the same thing so it must be ok" Can you try some critical thinking?
You really think stating MGM's policy is a strong argument for why DGG should do the same? How about providing am actual argument relating to the validity of said policy. But you won't. You just say "look over there. They do the same thing so it must be ok" Can you try some critical thinking?
